CHIVALRY IS
DEAD....AND WOMEN KILLED IT
Romeo and Juliet. Tristan and Iseult.
Lancelot and Guinevere. Ramsey Nouah and Genevieve. Common factor- these men
have proven time and again that they would die for their women if need be (although
I can't really vouch for the last couple, you know how deceptive Nollywood can
be). They have slain dragons, and braved storms, and fought armies, and even
drank poison to prove their love for the leading ladies in their lives. Over
the years, chivalry evolved into being just that show of general courtesy-you
know, when to a man, a woman’s a lady
in every sense of the word. For men these days, chivalry is opening the door
for a woman, getting up when a woman enters the room, giving up your place for
a woman, the whole nine yards. I imagine men reading this saying in their
minds,” for where?”
This concept is so foreign to men of
this generation because of the simple fact that chivalry is dead. Deader than
Attila the Hun. The sad part is that the women killed it. Ruthlessly.
Thoughtlessly. Brutally. Now I imagine women around the world (I like to think)
reading this and going, “Oh no, she didn’t!”
I am indeed sorry to say, Yes I did.
Come now, think about it. Little by
little, act after act, women methodically prove to the male folk that they are
just not worth the bloody effort. I know there are a few good women out there,
but just ask the guys, and they’ll tell you these women are like gold dust.
They’re either in the convent or they’re married to assholes (who, by the way,
can only be managed by the aforementioned few good women).
The women of this generation don’t
offer any incentive for men to even be nice to them, talk less about exhibiting
chivalry. I’m sure that at this juncture, feminists reading this will be filled
with righteous indignation (why the hell do we need them to be nice to us,
etc). But let’s face it, the world was a much more civilized place when women
were ladies and men were…well, whatever they were. The concept of liberalism
has created an allowance for all things previously deemed inappropriate and
decadent. At the risk of coming across as a prude (which I am most assuredly
not, I assure you with full assurance), I believe that I would have liked to
exist in those days of knights and their ladies fair. Think of all the heavy
lifting I would have avoided. All the noses I have been dying to bloody would
have been taken care of by a misguided chivalrous fool with just some discreet,
well-placed nudging on my part.
In those days, men would knock their
own brother into next tuesday for even hinting at the intent to insult a woman.
If you don’t believe it, refer to Benedick and Beatrice in Shakespeare’s Much
Ado About Nothing. In these women-wear-pants-too times, a man may meet his
brother on top of his wife and the worst that will happen is that he may not
speak to him for a weekend until they go to the family reunion and iron all
their issues out. The innate respect that men have for women has been
irrevocably stamped out by the antics of women. What man would waste the blood
of a total stranger much less his brother over a slack-thighed woman (pardon my
French) who didn’t even have the decency to have his dinner on the table before
climbing into bed with the maiguard.
Why would any man respect a woman
who would climb into bed with every Tom, Dick and Calistus, who he met when he
picked her up in some bar? What man would respect a woman who dresses like
Cinderella after her sisters had snatched all their accessories from
her-shabby, worn and naked? How can any
man respect a woman whose mouth is dirtier than a chimney sweep, a woman who
could turn the air around her a ribald shade of blue with a handful of choice
curse words? Show me that man and I will show you a transvestite feminist.
Women live by the principle of “Give
a little, expect a lot”. They want men to be men and women to be whatever they
want to be. But it is a simple case of action and reaction. Women demand
incessantly to be treated as the equals of men. The part that they did not
shout out loud is that this equal treatment is only feasible when it suits
them. The same woman who goes nose-to-nose with her husband over equal rights
in the kitchen suddenly becomes skittish when he raises his hand to hit her. If
she’s his equal (as she has spent all this time reminding the poor thing), then
both of them should be able to go, as equals, equally into a physical combat.
But no. It suddenly occurs to her that it is cowardly for a man to hit a woman.
If that’s not convenient, I don’t know what is.
There is a reason why men are
created the way they are inside and out. They’re here to serve and protect
their women, but to their utter astonishment, their women are no longer women
(the servees and the protectees) but they have now evolved into this other
creature which is a very convenient hybrid of man and woman characters, and
which no one thought to inform the poor men of their existence. Left confused
with these mutants (yes, I said it), they adapt the only way they know
how-employ brand new relationship skills. Voila-and so we have the contemporary
man-woman relationship.
And so, friends, my point is proven.
Chivalry is dead, and women killed it.